Washington Courts

Courts of Washington and Idaho

Sandra Ferguson WSBA Action: Hearing Officer Did Not Have Jurisdiction

without comments

Thoughts about the Sandra Ferguson WSBA Disciplinary Action. The hearing officer in the Ferguson case was not qualified to act. He did not have jurisdiction.

Why? Because the chief hearing officer, the person who appointed him, was not qualified to act as the chief hearing officer. The chief hearing officer making the appointment was James Danielson – an employee of, Jeffers - Danielson of in Wenatchee, Washington – the law firm which had been hired to perform chief hearing officer services under the terms of a written contract between the Bar Association and the law firm and James M. Danielson.

At the time of the proceedings against Sandra Ferguson, Stanley Bastian was the president elect, president and/or past president of the Bar Association. Prior to that, Mr. Bastion was a member of the Bar Board of Governors. Mr. Bastian was also a member of firm of Jeffers - Danielson and a fellow shareholder and employee, of James M. Danielson.ELC 2.6 (e)(4)(a) “[h]earing officers should disqualify themselves in a proceeding in which their impartiality might reasonably be questioned, . . . ” Surely, Jeffers - Danielson and James M. Danielson’s “impartiality might reasonably be questioned” and objectively so under the circumstances. They were disqualified. And any action of them or by them as chief hearing officer was without jurisdiction, even the discretionary appointment of a hearing officer from a list of hearing officers the chief hearing officer controlled and had duties with respect of. ELC 2.5(f).

What I have just described is a conflict of interest for the chief hearing officer. A conflict of interest going to Mr. Danielson’s jurisdiction to do anything in the case. 

Written by Steve Eugster

June 9th, 2010 at 3:36 pm